Chronic

17^th Feb 2014

Dear M Lafferty,

Having read the 1 and 2 application rules, I copy them below for reference; I believe I have complied with those instructions, in particular, 1. d-f.

Rules of Court

Rule 47

1–Contents of an individual application

1.An application under Article 34 of the Convention shall be made on the application form provided by the Registry, unless the Court decides otherwise. It shall contain all of the information requested in the relevant parts of the application form and set out

(a) the name, date of birth, nationality and address of the applicant and, where the applicant is a legal person, the full name, date of incorporation or registration, the official registration number (if any) and the official address;

(b) the name, occupation, address, telephone and fax numbers and e

- mail address of the representative, if any;

(c) the name of the Contracting Party or Parties against which the application is made;

(d) a concise and legible statement of the facts;

(e) a concise and legible statement of the alleged violation(s) of the Convention and the relevant arguments; and

(f) a concise and legible statement confirming the applicant’s compliance with the admissibility criteria laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.

2.

(a) All of the information referred to in paragraph 1 (d) to (f) above that is set out in the relevant part of the application form should be sufficient to enable the Court to determine the nature and scope of the application without recourse to any other document.

(b) The applicant may however supplement the information by appending to the application form further details on the facts, alleged violations of the Convention and the relevant arguments. Such information shall not exceed 20 pages.

If however you are indicating 2 b, I do believe that it is optional to put relevant argument but I would like to draw the courts attention to the fact that in my Supreme Court application, I have counter-argued each point of the final Judgment, therefore I feel since all the documents are in the application, I have no need for unnecessary duplication. Please see the Supreme Court 1^st application it is the first document in the application and points to relevant argument as to how my judgment misrepresented my legal argument in full.

Namely I pleaded that my lease contract made me insured to which I paid a contribution towards and my landlord did not exercise my rights conferred under the said contract/lease. This in ‘contract’ made me uninsured and breached the contract in law. I pointed this out to the Court of Appeal. I believe it is an issue of National importance because if a landlord does not make claims then is backed up by the joint insurance in court to save a claim then common sense says that no small business is insured at all, so what are we paying for?

I further argued that clause 5(22) in my leases where I cannot breach the terms of the insurance myself should at the very least, backed by the relevant and current laws to which I went on to argue in the Court of Appeal, be an implied obligation for the landlord, notwithstanding that the contract was simply breached by the landlord making me in law un-insured hence breach of lease.

I at no point in the case asked for a ‘repairing obligation’ to be implied. I had to learn a lot of laws for the Court of Appeal and I am not so stupid as to argue for an implied repairing obligation, when I have no repairing obligations as I am insured too, with the same insurer. To what law is it said I asked to be implied?

The judgment stated as fact that this is what I asked for. I did not. This is a lie.  The Judgment goes to great lengths to justify an imaginary case I did not plead. The transcript will prove it.

I have been misrepresented in full by the Court of Appeal and duly ignored by the Supreme Court (until this month 8 months too late, when I put it publically on the internet that I was in Europe) and this is not the first time that I have been treated unfairly in this trial that has lasted for 6 years, as stated in the, statement of facts no 14. The whole case has been unfair from the start to finish as stated.

Therefore to have access to Justice and the courts with speed, which is what is enshrined in the convention article 6, has been wholeheartedly breached and therefore my basic human rights have been violated let alone suffering loss of my life, health (chronic urticaria and depression), possessions and finances and being forced to learn the law and represent myself too or lose everything I have worked for in my life. I am not degree educated as I was taken into care at 13yrs.

I have survived an attempt, to ruin me for life, not only taking my premises by trespass with rent paid breaching article 1, but by judicial corruption in my case proved by me with documents catching the judiciary in this country red handed.

Further for this application I have sent the Feb ‘reply’ from the Supreme Court.

It would seem your request and my sending of the ‘reply’, crossed in the post.

Article 1 & 6 in my application is referenced here below but please note that I am not legally trained in any way and I cannot get a British Lawyer to represent me in this case because of the potential consequences for their own career and thus potential compromise of my case by them because of this.

I would like some answers about at what stage I can get legal aid but I wonder if I can appoint a lawyer in Europe who may not feel as much compromised?

I have put in article 13 here too but that is what I am doing now seeking effective remedy. Thus I do believe I only need quote Article 1 Protection of Property and Article 6 Right to a fair trial.

ARTICLE 1

Obligation to respect human rights

The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their

jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this

Convention.

– Protocol 1

Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Paris, 20.III.1952

THE GOVERNMENTS SIGNATORY HERETO, being members of

the Council of Europe,

Being resolved to take steps to ensure the collective enforcement

of certain rights and freedoms other than those already included

in Section I of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

and Fundamental Freedoms signed at Rome on 4 November

1950

(hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),

Have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE 1

Protection of property

Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment

of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions

except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided

for by law and by the general principles of international law.

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair

the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary

to control the use of property in accordance with the general

interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions

or penalties.

ARTICLE 6

Right to a fair trial

1.

In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of

any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair

and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent

and impartial tribunal established by law.

ARTICLE 6

Right to a fair trial

1.

In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of

any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair

and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent

and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be

pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded

from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order

or national security in a democratic society, where the interests

of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so

require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the

court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the

interests of justice.

2.

Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed

innocent until proved guilty according to law.

3.

Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following

minimum rights:

(a)

to be informed promptly, in a language which he

understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the

accusation against him;

(b)

to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of

his defence;

(c)

to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of

his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay

for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests

of justice so require;

(d)

to examine or have examined witnesses against him and

to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on

his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against

him;

(e)

to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot

understand or speak the language used in court.

[ARTICLE 13

Right to an effective remedy

Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention

are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national

authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed

by persons acting in an official capacity.]

In your first letter you asked for me to re-sign the application. In your second letter you asked for me to send the Supreme Court reply. To both I have done. I hope this means that the 4^th April can be ignored as I have a lease that runs out by then and any action before that can save my life as I know it, as I have replied. If there is anything further you need in the application now, or once it ‘s reviewed by chamber, I can provide it. I can also provide argument if you choose to ask for some from the UK at that stage.

I do believe their can be remedy and am willing to be given an offer by the UK but not one that in no way reflects my losses of hundreds of thousands of pounds. I see no point in compromise when all I want is accurate justice and a fair trial.

I have conducted myself professionally throughout and to the best of my ability despite the emotional and financial hardship to stay on legal aid to pay court costs and do the case myself I have thus far survived and by the mercy of God.

Everyday I risk falling, everyday I suffer, I am on a balancing act mentally and financially holding back a wave that could kill me for good, losing more than I have already lost when they hit me with half a million in costs.

What did I do to deserve such illegality by so many interested in protecting themselves? This case is completely extraordinary.

You must understand that I simply was trying to run two businesses and had serious repairs that needed doing on my insurance that the powerful landlord avoided. I did not set out to do battle with my landlord, nor their insured, nor the courts but in doing so I have hi-lighted some very important law internationally and that has serious consequences for insurers on repairing obligations.

Therefore they fight me all together with fierce means. I also believe they are active in destroying my reputation and also are working behind the scenes to stop me claiming any current losses by contacting agents that give me bookings and making legal requests to stop that, as it would show current losses to date.

This case is very active in it’s continued persecution of me and another on a daily basis for which we just need to see it ended with fair justice and of all those I normally represent in my work of setting up a youth economy to fight for children’s rights in this country. While I am out of action things are going wrong and I who they trust cannot help them at all as I have been robbed of my means.

Can you can add this to 1. E of the application as an additional 4 pages in accordance to 2B.

Article 35. 3. B shows that this application fulfils the criteria of significant disadvantage.

Kind Regards

Ms Mary Josofar Valdivieso Fortuno Flores.