Friday, 30 October 2015

I remember writing this in 2010 re what I was doing with New NAYPIC/Youth Parliament and the positive direction we had been taking for some time

Why Are My dreams So Crazy…

I dream of Diamond shaped glass independent play facilities for the kids, with cinema seats with interactive controls for the big screen in front of them and catwalks for fashion shows, with television and broadcasting suites under the edge of the diamond that all link to each other across the country, that can also be hired out to make money for the kids too and a ten person contemporary serviced office above accessed from the other side that can be hired out to businesses on an annual basis to keep the Diamonds in the kids hands and to pay for itself, to adapt to change, to pay the bills, the surplus to fund head office of spaceshift. I see each one with a beam that can shine into the sky and on occasions we can have them all light up the whole sky and the whole country. Like the day of the Olympics. Yes what a change children with the power to be heard!

I see a £1.2 Billion Pounds Social Investors for the first few years only!

I see National membership of 12 million children.

I see new businesses invented by the kids and invested in by spaceshift.

I see my old landlord Community Housing Association apologising to me and them having the shops they were given by Camden Council to them free confiscated from them and being given back to me who paid for them, done them up and then had them robbed off me in a brutal court case!

I see International Development to establish an independent Youth Economy! This is because I believe the children who you too once were, are Gagged!!

I see a Youth Parliament Building, with high tech pods in a huge circle, representatives elected and being interactive from the circle as well as the country as the National meetings take place.

I see voting booths in the street designed for kids that are topical and instant.

I see a ‘Children’s Law Practice’ funded by the Youth Parliament to compensate victims and to lobby for changes in law with test cases being used.

I see a Youth Parliament SAS style military to combat child abuse.

I see a sentencing review, including witness protection for whistle blowers of the big boys who are making the money out of maintaining this old fashioned sub-culture, which serves to hide the old fashioned money making industry.

I see consumer training given to professionals by victims as to how they have social care so wrong and how it further abuses the majority and is self serving for the mental health institutions and the legal drug companies.

I see the launch of our own tracking satellite to ensure a confidential data cloud for communications that ensures personal accessible earth map and instant access to photographic and television evidence of kidnappers of children and can be accessed immediately by the Youth Parliament in emergencies.

I want many more parties, networking, exhibitions, art, design and beauty as I had for the past ten years… because I like to dance and sing, help people meet up with each other that they may never meet and have fun with and be happy as many people do…

and I want it all..


Wednesday, 21 October 2015

A Youth Economy would be a budget that would be administered by children & young people who have been elected in their local area's in the UK. At present there is no central agency that represents the views & opinions of young people. This budget would be given to them by law to organize collective opinion of youth, they will manage the money themselves and it can never be taken off them by another political administration even if they don't like the views of the youth. The Youth Economy will be the final teeth of children's rights! The Youth Parliament will represent all UK youth and not be as is current a toothless and ineffectual adult led & organised middle class fake of an organization which although respectable & acceptable has no real power! Youth Parliament will for the most part seek to encourage the most abused of children in society to be the leader voices of a Youth Parliament. This is because they know more than most through experience but also their abuse can help to stop the abuse of any one of 12 million UK children. This is a union of New NAYPIC (National Association of Young People in Care) /Youth Parliament put together, youth from care and all youth united! It is essential that the structure is put together using experts in the field who have worked for NAYPIC so have done this organising before in connection with the association of directors of social services as before too but as quickly as possible. However this cannot be done without the first ever tabled motion, voted for in parliament, for a youth economy by statue & by law forever! Lets be the first to lead youth to freedom by helping them now to have this voice!

The YE-HA (Youth Economy) Bill
1.     The Children’s Act 1989 recognised that the welfare of the child is paramount and set out an overarching system for safeguarding children and the roles different agencies play. It introduces the concept of consulting children and young people based on their age and understanding.
2.     The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 was ratified by the UK in 1991. It set out the principle for a legal framework to underpin all aspects for the care, development and education of all children. It sets out the first ever right to ‘freedom of expression’ and ‘freedom of association’, for children to meet and form associations.
3.     The Government having considered over 30 public inquiries into child care since the 1970’s should adhere to these recommendations in both the Children Act 1989 and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 legislations and these recommendations should now be built upon.
4.     There is no central agency that expresses the child’s view-point on any issue of public importance that concerns children and young people directly. In fact most agencies pay mere lip service to consumer involvement and may just tick boxes to adhere to ‘freedom of expression’ legislation by using token representatives, from think tanks to government working parties. Children and young people do not run most if not all, child consumer organisations. Their governance is made up of senior adults often with establishment links. Many consumer child-care groups are reliant on government or other funding. This cannot allow them any freedom to express themselves.
5.     It is time we act on children’s rights legislation as a matter of urgency. In the face of political resistance to investigating matters of historical abuse we may not ever be able to truly understand the magnitude to which children have suffered in the past. However for us to change the course of history currently, rather than wait on yet another public inquiry, we must be able to see and hear and firmly put the child in the public eye immediately.
6.     Proposal to be voted on in this Bill is that each child & young person under 19 has a pound each year, in sterling, to be ring-fenced for the twelve million children and young people in the UK from the Treasury. This will provide financial independence as a statutory right enshrining current law in practical terms, to meet and form associations and to have freedom of expression. It may in turn start to inform us the public of the wishes and feelings of the child in the UK preventing child abuse in the future.
Reference; UN Convention on the Rights of a Child 1989, Children Act 1989, Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and 2005, Protection of Children Act 1999, Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001, Adoption and Children Act 2002, Every Child Matters: Change for Children 2003, Children Act 2004, Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006, updated 2010, Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, Childcare Act 2006, Education (Nutritional Standards & Requirements for School Food) Regulations 2007, amendments 2008, The Charter for Children’s Play 2007, updated 2009, The Play Strategy 2008, Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) 2008, amended 2012, Equalities Act 2010.

A successful youth parliament could also help to support victims & survivors of historical abuse.

Thursday, 8 October 2015

NAYPIC has always been there... See you soon..

NAYPIC Letters from Prime Minister & Home Office 2012
NAYPIC website est 1999
NAYPIC HQ in 2008 self sufficient money making, stylish & creating an independent Youth Economy
And we will rise again when a youth economy is put firmly put on the map.

Thousands worked with us & for us, as NAYPIC rules OK...


Sunday, 4 October 2015

6th Oct Panorama - Platform for a crook?


BBC platform for crook?

When you asked me to participate in the programme, currently scheduled for broadcast on Tuesday 6 October, I asked you, ‘what is it about’? You replied, Chris Fay. I asked you, ‘Do you want to give a convicted fraudster license to print money?’

I have refused to take part in the programme, despite increasingly intrusive efforts to encourage me to do so.

And I ask you the question again. Because what I mean by a ‘license to print money’ is this. Chris Fay will capitalise on BBC criticism, garner support, acquire kudos, and he will moneterise notoriety.

You will provide a platform to a convicted criminal.  

In the course of doing so you will risk distracting from the important business at hand: the full and proper investigation into institutional abuse of children. I have to consider if this is the intention?

I ask you to cancel this ill considered, poorly motivated broadcast.

I would be most grateful if you could forward a copy of your programme to me at your earliest convenience. I have written to the Press Complaints Commission because I have considerable concerns about the programme.

1.     Reputational risk
You will be aware of the damage you are trying to do to the good name of the National Association of Young People in Care (NAYPIC), the organisation that supported and represented the interests of young people in, or leaving, care. The purpose of NAYPIC was to provide advice about further education, housing and benefits, signposting services, and information and resources to young people. The organisation championed the rights of those who had, through no fault of their own, left or been removed from their families and had been, or were currently, in local authority care.  

I was the last chair of the National Association of Young People in Care and continue to act as chair with the support of members of the management committee. Although the Association is not active, its reputation as a leading organisation, providing a voice to young people who have experienced the care system, is important to both myself, staff, funders and committee members, and most importantly those who have known the organisation as a credible and valuable source of advice, information and support.

It is for reasons of reputational risk, and to ensure the safeguarding of service users, I discharged Christopher Fay from his voluntary role in 1991. Mr Fay had attended our offices in a voluntary capacity for a very short period of time.

I would ask the BBC to cease and desist from referring to the National Association of Young People in Care in your show. I would ask you to also cease and desist from mentioning Christopher Fay in the context of NAYPIC an organisation with which he volunteered for only a short period. Mr Fay never represented the organisation and is certainly not its spokesperson. He merely assisted in some analytical, statistical research.

2.     Right to privacy
Following reports in newspapers last week, I was photographed in the street, while going about my business a little way from my home. The photographers were using professional camera equipment. The reasons for wanting to take photographs of me are not known. These individuals may have been staff press photographers or ‘chancers’ intending to sell a picture to the press. More worryingly, they may be violent thugs working for one or other of the many factions involved in child abuse; those commissioning child abuse, protecting perpetrators or carrying out attacks on victims, and witnesses who speak out or come forward to cooperate with police investigations. You have brought trouble to my door and whether or not this is deliberate, you have become complicit in this risk to my privacy, at the very least, and possibly my safety.

3.     ********’s vulnerability
I have recently been in regular contact with ********, a former client, who has indicated to me in our discussions that he never wanted to participate in your programme. ******** is a former service user and a sensitive and kind man. He is also, however, very vulnerable and I am extremely concerned about the impact the broadcast of your programme may have on his emotional wellbeing.

4.     I am perfectly sure you are aware of my complaints, have seen my blog and referred to my Twitter account where I discuss what I believe could be described as your harassment of ******** – your numerous phone calls to him, frequent visits to his home (all paid for by the licence payer) in your pursuit of a ‘story’. ******** is under police surveillance, the police say, for his own protection, and that they have put CCTV cameras in his house.

******** also told me that you and/or members of the BBC production team, asked him to come to my house wired, with a microphone, to talk to me, posing as a friend, to ask me questions related to your research, and to record our conversation. It was following this conversation with ******** that I sought advice from a lawyer, a senior media solicitor.

If it is the case that Mr Fay has received money, or remuneration in kind, for his participation in your programme, and/or in relation to the story of ********, I would remind you that I have not spoken to, written to or heard from Mr Fay in 25 years, that he acts for and on behalf of his own monetary or political interests.

5.     Prejudice to ongoing investigations

I am concerned that your programme, and what appear to be rather odd agendas, ethics and judgements, could prejudice ongoing enquiries and investigations. There is a danger your programme will undermine the possibility of justice for those whose lives have been impacted by, in some cases irreparably damaged by, child abuse.

As with the Dame Janet Smith Review into the BBC, that has been delayed as it may prejudice a live investigation, I would suggest the programme should be delayed while investigations continue, criminal cases are heard, and that those referred to, or alluded to, in your report receive a right of reply. 

Abuse witnesses/allegations:
Elm Guest House. This is a case I became familiar with after Carol Cazier asked NAYPIC to provide support to her children in care. Subsequently I gave evidence at a coroner’s hearing into her death.  I mentioned Leon Brittan at that hearing as a guest of Elm Guest House because Carol Cazier told me that he had been a visitor. This is shown in the coroner court transcripts and court and other reports that appeared in a number of newspapers. Chris Fay appears to be ‘claiming credit’ for exposing Leon Brittan. I simply gave evidence in court, while being questioned about the suspicious events surrounding the death of a Carol who had sought NAYIC’s support for her children, who she felt had been wrongly taken into care. This was one of hundreds of cases that I managed that year. And whether allegations concerned a public figure or an unknown abuser, this made no difference, as far as I was concerned.

As you know I put Mr Fay’s notes on the internet as my own had been taken in a raid on the offices of the National Association of Young People in Care in 1993. During that raid, clients’ files were removed. I returned to the office during the raid and recovered a number of files. As you know I was raided again more recently, on this occasion by police in 2012, shortly after Tom Watson made his House of Commons announcement about VIPs.

********’s case
His case is still being investigated and there is a risk to his chances of securing a safe conviction in a case that involves how care authorities failed in their duty of care, and put him in danger, resulting in ******** experiencing extremely traumatic events.  If you are concerned, as I am that ******** is being used, or coached, then please take the matter to the police.

6.     Separate issues

a.     Chris Fay is a crook.

b.     There are those involved in these matters who could be described as star-struck opportunists.

c.     There has been abuse of children at a very senior level.

d.     There are many who have been seriously abused in institutions.

e.     ******** is a vulnerable person who is trying to secure justice.

I would urge you to consider how you may have confused these issues.


Mary Moss

Friday, 2 October 2015

NAYPIC's Community Interest Company One Percent 4 ART formerly NAYPIC HQ Scarlet Maguire Gallery & spaceshift.. of St Pancras (Still in an insurance dispute of two million quid)

For more information on NAYPIC see & & as well as see websites of our two premises since 1999-2013 at & NAYPIC is currently lobbying for a statutory budget by law for young people in the UK to have money from the Treasury by civil right for an independent YOUTH ECONOMY at £1 per baby, children & young person that making 12 mil quid per annum... It's a tiny amount but needs an urgent bill to be passed as an emergency in the House of Commons!!!
Thus far Mary Moss has funded NAYPIC since Government withdrew funding 1993 and until such time as there is the next National Conference she is still the last elected chair until NAYPIC/Youth Parliament is re-established by LAW as voted for by 1100 at the last 1993 conference in London.

Ethical Equity Share with a possible modest return in year one. 50,000 shares available.

Ethical Equity Share with a possible modest return in year one. 50,000 shares available.

Our Price: £5.00


We have valued the Company at £500,000 in the first year of trading.

If we sell 10% equity shares in the business then we will have the start up capital to start employing more staff. This ethical Community Interest Share is for life so even though you may not get much in the first year you will when the company grows.

You can buy as many shares as you like.

These shares represent 10% future equity of the Community Interest Company business 'One Percent 4 ART'.

By selling 10% of the business now through the 50,000 shares at £5 each, you are now investing your £5 for one share as an 'ethical equity' share. You buy once and watch it rise or fall, it's that simple.

The business will make £250,000 by selling 50,000 shares and we value that at present to be 10% or more of the projected profit of the company in the first few years.

One Percent 4 ART is a Community Interest Company - The aims of the company are;

A. Selling Artwork through 1%4ART business

B. Design & Build local Diamond interactive art play facilities.

C. Buy Head Quarters building to link all the Diamond interactive play facilities together technologically & via satellite to elevate art promotion.

D. To buy/build further artistic businesses, to generate eco-living, healing & independent produce.

E. To ensure a non-bureaucratic structure with individual’s freedom of artistic expression.

1. To Design an artistically conceptual building, that when built by the company will promote the creative and artistic ideas of youth.

2. To engage with all mainstream media communication formulas to communicate the creative expression in terms of artistic ideas of all youth.

3. To promote through mainstream channels the creative artistic ideas of all youth from all diversification's of backgrounds, social stratosphere's, regardless of age or understanding and to utilize the artistic buildings and channels of communication and promotion for this purpose.

4. To remain independent and self-sufficient at all times, in the creation of and the promotion of these creative artistic platforms of the youth ideas, for the sole purpose of their purity.

5. To initiate and execute a 5 step plan (A-E above) of expanding the (association) Company through businesses, that further the artistic freedoms of expression of all youth and to adapt to changes in the development of those artistic expressions where it is necessary to stay up to date with the youths artistic ideas and concepts.

To buy a share through the One Percent 4 Art website, just add it to the shopping cart..


Thursday, 1 October 2015

Press Complaints Commission..

Complaint against BBC‏

Complaint against BBC

One of the victims of abuse on the 6th Oct Panorama has asked not to have footage shown and has said that not only did he not give knowing consent he has also sent a letter drawn up from Exaro to which Panorama have said they don't take seriously.

Also two other victims have said they were NAYPIC cases. I can confirm they were not any cases of any member of NAYPIC's staff.

Also I am complaining that the Telegraph have associated Mr Chris Fay as the head of National Association of Young People In Care. He was neither a worker nor a member he can only be described as a one time advisor who gave information to NAYPIC.

I am also going to ask you to look into the story of the Daily Mail associating this one time crook with our good name, when he was sacked and asked never to come back over 25 years ago.

Mary Moss