Call for Solicitor against police

I am in a probate case where my father died 24/11/22 leaving a 1.2mil house.
 
My brother we believed forged a cheque (after death) to make him the main heir, out of seven children. 
He hired solicitors to allegedly fake a will (according to handwriting expert) and presented the forged cheque to these solicitors, who cashed it illegally, a day after death (we informed them it was forged early 2023 but they continued to act 'unauthorised', with no due dillegence), the bank said in mid Nov 24 it was fraudulent. The sum in a normal probate case the solicitors act in is £5k minimum on their website yet this was just £1,080 and the bank has now proved the fraud, making these solicitors totally 'unauthorised'.
 
My older sister has been complaining, seeking an investigation of Hubbard Pegman & Whitney solicitors through the SRA but she got cancer 16th June 24 so has had to slow down, hence me dealing a bit with it.
 
On 23rd June 2024, I went to the premises, to see if my brother was renting them.
 
On 24th July 2024 a full phat month later, I got an email, containing a malicious allegation from the unauthorised solicitors, regarding £5k damage, to the stain glass in the front door, on June 23rd 24.

There was no coloured glass on the floor in video taken, by the illegal occupant, that the police/solicitors and Pat, presented as their evidence.. an elementary mistake, don't you think, since I'm in the video!!!

 

I knew that the stain glass was not damaged at all as it just fell in, as you can see, the stain glass is missing, it's fallen behind the door, hanging at the back of the door and it's complete which is great and

it's utterly undamaged, except the plain glass covering it had broken but that's worth around £20, to replace. Regardless it's not £5k! The police had never even been there so it was all made up after the event. These solicitors 'malicious allegation' which is a criminal offence, letter stated that the matter was with the police!! So it's bad enough they are unauthorised, by the Legal Services Act and standing in the way of our inheritance, damaged our oldest sisters health, now this! They know £5k is a jailable offence and they all know, the police don’t see eye to eye with me, so it's particularly malicious as I've no criminal record. 

I saw this as an after the event way of setting me up and although I had previously not wanted to press criminal charges against the firm and my brother, preferring to be civil and let my sister deal with 'step negligence', in a death bed will through the SRA, I now knew this firm and my brother were playing badly.
 
I made a 101-report immediately and sent it back to these solicitors, Charlotte Pegman, stating that this was a 'malicious allegation', that the firm had 'cashed a forged dead man’s cheque a day after he had died' and they were acting in an 'unauthorised capacity' and were also in that letter 'threatening theft by costs'.
 
I made the police report out at 3am, 24th July 2024, as I had only just seen their email in the middle of the night, from the firm with this, alarming malicious allegation and police action threat, so I responded quick.
 
I sent the 101 police report to Charlotte Pegman, the author of the HPW letter, she is a contentious probate litigator/solicitor for the firm, whom my brother had in Jan 23 employed, (recently the SRA told us that they renounced their executor position on my birthday 23rd Jan 23' and made one son the benfactor, the 'executor'.. doesn't make sense, since they sent us 'will' letters in Feb 2023) to in his words, 'treat them like strangers'. He really likes money doesn't he? The firm had a percentage interest written into the fake will.
 
 
At 8.30am 24th July 2024 three crime detective police officers which are flat capped like these

from Charing Cross police, in uniform, with a marked car, sped into my street, they got in through two locked doors, presenting at my flat door, on the third floor of my four-storey building.
 
They are not my local police, Holborn and they are not my next nearest Islington, nor Kentish Town, the third nearest but you have to also be alarmed or aware of their senior rank? Especially when I've done nothing but had warning with the solicitors dodgy letter only a few hours before, it's well OTT right?
 
I was too worried to answer the door as I was aware that I now had a malicious allegation against me. Instead, I immediately called the police (I recorded the call) and was told that they had nothing on the 

national police data base around my name or my address and they did not know why they were outside. 

So, I also called the local police and checked with them, (recording that call) again nothing.

 

I went to Kent to a Travel Lodge to stay safe as the next day I had to go to Brighton to my other sister’s music degree graduation, that I just could not miss.
 
I was very aware of being surveyed.
 
I then went home and I got a very dodgy unprofessional 'honest to God' language, phone call (I recorded).

 

It was a man claiming to be from Charing Cross police but bearing in mind I have an address for post and an email address that could have been used from 23rd June 2024 and it was now 2nd August 2024, a full 5 weeks later, again I treated this call with doubt especially when I tried to engage with the man and he said, “honest to god, you just don’t understand, you just have to come down to Charing Cross police station”, and then hung up when I was questioning firstly assertions and that it was civil and mine and if it was an interview under caution and if I could have a time and a solicitor present? It seemed a chancy phone call.

Then on 5th August 2024, three plain clothed, bullet proof vested, 

fire arms officers, arrived at my door, with one brandishing a battering ram, without a warrant.
Again I called the police, (I filmed the event & Live streamed) and I was arrested.
 
I had my rights read to me outside my door after I had locked it and was on my stairwell third floor and one of them turned around and prevented me from continuing down my stairs to the three steps down window stairwell, with just his groin. They then searched me and took my keys, they also asked for my mobile phone and I replied, “I threw it out the window” and they said “we’ll see it on the way down then”. Alarmed by his lack of use of his hands, I took down my jeans to show, no weapon, showing my pockets, empty and put them back up and the same man said, ‘oh don’t be a child”. Later in the car he said his wife works at the child abuse inquiry (I thought what but it's over).
 
I knocked on my neighbour’s door when passing it on a lower floor and said, loudly, “I’m being arrested” and she then subsequently got more mobile footage including, me being handcuffed in the car, whilst three officers were around me.
 
In the car, the officer said, “are we going to be famous then, what channel are we being live-streamed” and I said, “YouTube” but wondered how he would know?
 
Even though they and the questioning DI were from Charing Cross police, they were asked by my neighbour where I was being taken and they said Islington police station.
 
In the cage before entering the custody suite, a WPC was asked to search me.
 
The desk sergeant arrived, opening the door and said, “take those off her” meaning the handcuffs as I wasn't a flight risk and it seemed by his tone ridiculous.
 
I was then asked my details and finger printed and put in a cell whilst the DI arrived from Charing Cross police. He insistently looked into the cell. He then arrived a few hours later and with a paralegal who had also according to my friend outside, arrived much earlier too, questioned me, mentioning trusts, and things that seemed beyond my knowledge, so I was advised anyway to do a ‘no comment’ interview. I asked the paralegal to give a statement at the end, to say;
“I have made a 101 report this morning that this is a malicious allegation, that the person/people making it have committed fraud, by way of a forged cheque and I should not have been arrested when I was easily contacted formally”
 
Then instead of releasing me, without charge since
1.    They had never visited the premises or investigated in June 2024.
2.    They called the place road and street so had no knowledge of the address.
3.    Had arrested for a crime worth £5k a jailable offence, when the officers stated at the desk to the sergeant, “more like £500” (actually £20).
They locked me in the cell for a further few hours and released me after 7 hours.
 
Further the CPS asked them to ‘investigate’ which seemed the wrong way around and they then ‘police bailed’ me to Charing Cross police station on Sunday 3rd November 2024, without any charge at all.
 
Now, I knew that was dangerous situation to be in as they had already showed excessive force and policing and also knew this was not a £5k jailable offence.
 
I would then be in fear of being stopped whilst on bail for just about anything and so I applied to the local magistrate’s court in Islington on 27th Sept 2024 after no contact from them whatsoever, for a police bail hearing to have it lifted and then I served it to my crime solicitors, Charing Cross police, the DCI because apparently he was in charge, I was told, after complaining to the DPS, who said they could not deal with a live investigation, so to contact him, so I served the Bcl001.
 
Within less than a minute, the solicitors called me saying that the police had no further actioned it. She said they were just putting together the paperwork.
 
I never got the paperwork. I asked the solicitor to ask them but she didn’t.
 
I had no formal way of knowing that I was off police bail or not?
 
I had to cancel a trip to Spain as I had to attend on the 3rd Nov 2024 but since I went to the old station which was closed and then got some police activity around I decided that since I was late, perhaps I would take the word of the solicitor.
 
I then had an anxious week waiting about to be potentially missed bail arrested.
 
I made a freedom of information request only to find out 26th Nov 2024 that the police only did the NFA on 23rd Oct 2024 so I was right to be cautious and they still have it on the police database.
 

During Nov NatWest bank said the cheque that paid the solicitors was a forgery yet they are still at large and despite this none of the parties have been arrested. I reported as told to do so, in interview, the forged cheque as a different incident but they are linked. So, after all this I only did on the 8th Oct 2024, when I could be forgiven for maybe believing that I may possibly be off police bail even though I wasn’t and again within 33 minutes of the 101 report, I had a phone call from a police officer who said she was outside my flat, luckily I wasn’t there, and she said to go to the police in Kentish Town or in Islington.
 
Instead, I went to Holborn after photocopying £50 of evidence and putting it in six envelopes, to six police forces by registered tracked post.
 
Fearing for my safety I then went to court 37 and managed to get a 4pm hearing regarding the forged cheque and he was an excellent judge, like I hadn’t seen in many years and understood I wanted to cut the gordian knot so he said do a money claim.
 
The solicitors asked for strict proof of forgery so I got a handwriting expert and then was able to use that for the bank fraud team who responded quickly saying even without the handwriting expert they could see it was not the handwriting or signature of their client.
 
I want to have a 100% compensation CFA for wrongful arrest, battery and false imprisonment.
 
I also want this removed from my record since it’s defamatory and they never believed it to be true either so it looks terrible for a DBS;
 
Disposal History
Disposal (NFA)
Description: NFA (NO FURTHER ACTION) 23/10/24 AT 01FH
NFA Date: 23/10/24
Text: INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
Offence Count: 1
Owner: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE)
Last Updated: 23/10/24
Offence
Arrest/Summons Ref: 24/0000/00/989601B
Crime Reference: 01FH12135/24/1
Offence Number: 1
Court/Caution/Force Reference: 01FH/12135/24/1
Court Offence Number: 1
Adjudication: NFA (NO FURTHER ACTION)
Originator: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE)
Offence Description: DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY (VALUE OF DAMAGE OVER
£5000 – OFFENCE AGAINST CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1971 ONLY)
ACRO Subject Access Request SA/24/031784 Mary Josephine MOSS
Your disclosure is for personal use only - you are NOT obligated to provide this to a third party.
Page 2 of 2
Offence Date(s): 23/06/24 11:11
Disposal: NFA (NO FURTHER ACTION) 23/10/24 AT 01 (METROPOLITAN
POLICE) FS/REF: 01 (METROPOLITAN POLICE)